Showing posts with label Lebanon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lebanon. Show all posts
Views
Published by

Normalisation Of Occupation In Movies

Photo: from the movie 'Waltz with Bashir'
by Bea for Palestine (*)

This is a part from a longer piece I wrote, I made a fast translation to english about the Movie “Waltz With Bashir”, which I think is a movie that tries to Normalize the violence inflicted on the Palestinians. With the last Assault on Gaza its important to Highlight those normalization attempts.

SHOOT AND CRY
Some may wonder why my focus is describing the dehumanization of Palestinians, without taking a closer account of Israeli suffering. The answer is simple. No one would require that as much interest was directed towards how the French felt during all the years they colonized other countries. Nor would the Boers in South Africa be put at the same level in an analysis of apartheids humanitarian affects and emotional impacts. During Israel's war against Lebanon in 1982, when Sabra and Shattila suffered horrific massacres, a term was invented, Shoot and Cry. Later this attracted increasing interest, especially after the Israeli film "Waltz with Bashir" by Ari Folman, where the concept really gets a meaning. Shoot, attack, bomb, arrest and kill - there is always a chance to cry out afterwards, the concept could be summarized. You can mourn that you have killed someone, but the dead person does not leave any traces and gives no headlines in the media.

”We'll drop bombs on residential buildings, and then we'll treat the wounded at Ichilov; we'll shell meager places of refuge in United Nations schools, and then we'll rehabilitate the disabled at Beit Lewin Stein. We'll shoot and then we'll cry, we'll kill and then we'll lament, we'll cut down the women and children like automatic killing machines, and we'll overpriced preserve our dignity” (Levy, Haaretz, 2009).

Folman has won a number of prominent awards for his film, including Golden Globe, and it is hailed worldwide for its ability to describe the soldiers' deepest feelings, as the anxiety that comes after shooting someone in the head at such close range that the brain substance spread not only on the floors and walls, but also sticks to your own body. Or how the soldier has consigned all the memories of what happened in Sabra into places where it is black. Where memory is blank. Where the horror is bearable because it does not exist. Folman received his Golden Globe Award at the same time as the bombs rained down on Gaza, and Haaretz journalist Gideon Levy, was not slow to pay attention to this:

“It must be noted that this film is infuriating, disturbing, outrageous and deceptive. It deserved an Oscar for the illustrations and animation - but a badge of shame for its message. It was not by accident That When he won the Golden Globe, Ari Folman did not even mention the war in Gaza, Which was raging as he accepted the prestigious award. The images coming out of Gaza That Day looked remarkably like those in Folman's film. But he was silent. So before we sing Folman's praises, Which will of course ask praise for us all, we would do well to remember that this is not an anti-war film, nor even a critical work about Israel as militarist and occupier. It is an act of fraud and deceit, Intended to allow us to pat ourselves on the back, to tell us and the world how lovely we are (Haaretz 23/2 2009)”.

Just as the former colonial powers glorified his adventures, Israel uses this tactic as a tool to win public opinion, both at home, but perhaps especially in other countries where it is increasingly important to convince public opinion of who we really should feel sorry for. This is a Normalizing process, where the borders between those dropping the bombs from high altitudes and the ones getting bombed to pieces, is erased and the parts are compared as equals. We have to be awake for all attempts to normalize the totally abnormal in Occupying, Sieging and murder people under the cover of “Shoot and Cry”.
(*) Pseudonym of the author


Read More
Views
Published by

Nasrullah's Speech: A New Era

Hezbollah's secretary-general Hassan Nasrullah delivered a speech today. The speech which delivered after Hezbollah's response to the recent Israeli attack against the party's convoy in Golan Heights.

What's new?
1. The previous rules of engagement between Hezbollah and Israel are no longer exist, Nasrullah said.

2. Any Israeli attack against Hezbollah (including assassinations) will be responded in the "suitable" time and place.

3. Hezbollah will not allow Israel to partitionate the Arab-Israeli conflict into Syrian, Palestinian and Lebanese fronts. This is by far the most important strategic step.

4. For the first time ever, Hamas military commander Mohammad Dheif is sending a supportive (public) letter to Nasrullah. This means that the recent Israeli attack has enforced Hamas-Hezbollah relation.

5. Jabhat al-Nusra, the Syrian al-Qaeda branch --according to Nasrulla's own words-- is working officially side-by-side with the Israeli forces.

Read More
Views
Published by

Hezbollah Responds To The Israeli Attack

Not too late to respond!. Hezbollah attacked an Israeli military convoy in the occupied Sheb'aa Farms.  Two Israeli soldiers were killed in this attack. Hezbollah responded to an Israeli rocket attack in Syria.


Read More
Views
Published by

The Next Israel-Hezbollah Vis-à-vis

There are many scenarios for the inevitable Israel-Hezbollah war. But, it is quite hard to predict the course and consequences of the next vis-à-vis.

Two days ago, Israel attacked Hezbollah's military convoy in Syria. The attack occurred just few days after long televised interview with Hezbollah secretary-general Hassan Nasrullah. He stated that any assault on Syria is regarded as an attack on the "axis of resistance" in the region.

Israel responded to Nasrullah's interview
Hassan Nasrullah is undoubtedly an extraordinary Arab leader. Unlike other Arab leaders, he is well knowledgeable leader on the Israeli society, elections and other internal issues. 
I think he has special assistants specialized on monitoring the Israeli media and they speak Hebrew as second language.
Israel has studied the attack against Hezbollah very well, but the timing was not determined till Nasrullah's interview. It was essential for the Israelis to prove their military "superiority", especially after losing reputation among pro-resistance Arabs.

Psychological warfare: breaking down Nasrullah's theory
"Israel is weaker than the spider web" is Nasrullah's theory. He firstly mentioned the sentence after liberation of South Lebanon in 2000, to establish new theory based on the structure of the Israeli society and their intolerance towards longstanding war. Moreover, he emphasized on transferring the war field from the Arab side (which historically happened) towards the occupied Palestinian land.

Nasrullah's credibility and rationale made the man a "nightmare" for the Israeli cabinet and society. I personally watched (on TV interviews) some Israelis wishing to have such a leader!

Accordingly, the Israeli cabinet hardly seek to break down Nasrullah's theory. This is undoubtedly a strong motive to carry out the attack on Hezbollah's convoy.

The Syrian conflict encouraged Israel to attack Hezbollah
When Hezbollah intervened in the Syrian conflict, two years after abruption of Syrian crisis, the Israeli think-tanks were (literally) happy as the Syrian conflict will absorb all undesired forces. Al-Qaeda and its affiliated groups will fight the undesired Hezbollah and Ba'ath regime.
Nevertheless, when Hezbollah defeated Al-Qaeda affiliated groups in al-Qusayr town near Homs city, the Israelis recognized the experience which Hezbollah fighters gained in Syria. So, they were no longer euphoric.
However, Israeli forces utilized Jabhat al-Nusra in Golan heights against both the Syrian and Hezbollah forces. The Israeli PM visited the injured anti-Assad fighters in Safad hospital, and the UN forces in Golan heights (UNDOF) clearly stated the Israeli role in supporting Jabhat al-Nusra in the Golan heights.

The next Israel-Hezbollah vis-à-vis:
The Israeli strategy is clear. They will depend on massive destruction to press on Hezbollah and to support the stance of Hezbollah's antagonists (March 14 coalition). Israeli forces bet on:
1. High Lebanese death toll.
2. To coordinate attacks with the Syrian opposition forces (Jabhat al-Nusra and other al-Qaeda affiliated groups).
Nevertheless, Hezbollah has strategy too, including:
1. Gradually ascending war, it may be started as restricted attacks against the northern Israeli settlements.
2. Attacking vital targets in Haifa Gulf, such as: the oil refinery, petrochemical factories and the main electricity station.
3. Hezbollah will try to occupy the Galilee.
4. To apply "naval siege" via fast well-equipped boats holding anti-ship missiles.

The war may extend. If the US directly intervened with Israel, Iran would not let Hezbollah alone, but the Russian stance is not clear in this regard.

Read More
Views
Published by

BREAKING: Israeli Airstrike on Syria Kills Jihad Mughnyieh

A Hezbollah official says an Israeli strike in the Syrian Golan Heights killed Jihad Mughniyeh, the son of a slain top military commander, and four other fighters from the Lebanese Shiite militant group.

The official said the Sunday strike targeted two Hezbollah vehicles as fighters were inspecting positions in the area of Mazaare al-Amal in the mountainous plateau close to the Israeli-controlled frontier.
Jihad Mughniyeh
The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak to the media.
Jihad is the son of Emad Mughniyeh, a top Hezbollah operative assassinated in 2008 in Damascus. Hezbollah blames Israel for the killing.

Declaration:The editor refuse to call Hezbollah as "Shiite militant group", however, it was originally published on AP
Source: AP
Read More
Views
Published by

Nasrullah: Right About 'Takfiris', But Biased For Shi'a

Hezbollah secretary-general Hassan Nasrullah delivered speech tody. He talked about several topics, including, Al-Qaeda (Takfiri) terrorism, Lebanese issues and the situation in Bahrain.



Here are some comments about the speech:
1. He is right about the role of Takfiris in increased anti-islamism and Islamophobia. Their brutal actions actually increased hatred against Muslims.

2. He is right about Lebanon. In a country ruled from outside, he has no options but to deal with pro-US antagonists.

3. He frequently talks about the question of Bahraini people, however, Al-Assad regime is more brutal than the Bahraini regime. The Bahraini regime puts opponents in prison, while Al-Assad brutal regime has been killing and torturing opponents since 1972.  In other words, Nasrullah should, at least, have the same stance towards both the Syrian and Bahraini regimes, otherwise, he ought to stay silent.


Read More
Views
Published by

The US administration and local events

CIA  is no longer the major player in the Arab World in comparison with both eras of Cold War and post-USSR. Nevertheless, US administration is still having the upper hand by 'managing' local proxies.

Syrian crisis alongside the abrupt rising of what-so-called Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has exposed hesitated US formal role which triggered anger of allies and reinforced the opposed alliance. Al-Qaeda local branches have been revived to become the strongest anti-government forces in Syria, Iraq and even in Lebanon --it is worthy to mention that Hezbollah participates in Lebanese government--. Al-Qaeda affiliated groups (including ISIS) are fighting against Non-Sunni regimes, but if the conflict is actual sectarian one, the Omani regime should be included since it is Non-Sunni (Abadhi) one.

Western-Iranian negotiations 
Excluding two regimes, the world sigh deeply for Western-Iranian negotiations as sign of no-war status in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia and Israel have strongly opposed presumed American-Iranian 'rapprochement' and they held private and public meetings to exert pressure on the US administration against negotiations. Meanwhile, Syrian regime restored initiative against opponent militias with Iranian and Hezbollah help. The US allies realized that they must care of their interests by 'themselves' since the Americans disappointed them by undesired 'diplomatic' negotiations.

Personal hatred plays a role 
It is hard to understand regional politics without the role of personal hatred among Arab rulers. Most of Arab regimes are hereditary and the dynasty is the cornerstone. If Saudi prince has dispute with another Arab ruler, bilateral formal relations (between the two states) would be worsen and the ambassadors would be withdrawn. For instance, Libyan-Saudi diplomatic relation was frozen following personal 'fight' between the former Saudi crown-prince (current king) and deceased colonel Gaddafi.

Obama's Administration has changed previous Bush's doctrine. Soft power (including drones and proxy wars) have increasingly become among facilities. New energy sources and new Non-Middle Eastern oil resources required new thinking by American think-tanks, so the result would be clear shifting from Middle East. However, Western countries are still dependent on Arab oil and the US administration is 'worry' about Chinese economic and military acceleration, so they announced that Americans will re-enforce their presence (i.e, more military bases) in the Pacific region.

So far, Qatar is the only government holding official ties with Afghanistan's Taliban (al-Qaeda twin) world widely, and played a role in prisoners exchange between the US and Taliban recently. Moreover, Qatar officially supports anti-government militias in Syria and Iraq side-by-side with Turkey and Saudi Arabia despite Qatari-Saudi disputes regarding Egypt and the formula of Syrian opposition.

The US administration left vacuum in the Arab World to be filled by local proxies in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and Israel; al-Qaeda local branches have been revived to face Iranian influence in the region.That does not mean that the US has become 'weaker', but it is a strategic change as a result of consecutive wars, Chinese rising and the early signs of empire's deceleration.

Puffing the Venom
Encouraging sectarian conflict is a two-edge sword. It might topple Iraq's Al-Maliki for example, but puffs of venom will reach Eastern Saudi Arabia which inhabited by Shiite Muslims as well as Bahrain and Kuwait. No one can predict the results which will surely change current political and demographic maps. Saudi and Qatari media are 'celebrating' ISIS's control in Iraq (Arabic speakers can easily demonstrate these celebrations), for nothing, except because ISIS is fighting Iran's allies.

Lost amid the mess
Palestine News has the least media coverage. Beirut-based Al-Mayadeen channel might be the only pan-Arab media (as I can observe) that still put Palestine News as priority. Absurd wars have been started and no one knows the end.

Read More